Phaset vs Swarmia

Swarmia excels at engineering productivity metrics, but lacks a software catalog and requires recurring per-developer fees. Here's why teams might want to choose Phaset for different use cases.

Phaset and Swarmia solve different problems. Swarmia focuses on engineering productivity metrics and workflow optimization, while Phaset provides a comprehensive software catalog for architecture documentation, service ownership, and knowledge consolidation. If you need both capabilities, you might use them together—or choose Phaset's broader feature set with built-in DORA metrics.

1

Complete Software Catalog, Not Just Productivity Metrics

Swarmia

  • No software catalog functionality
  • Focuses on developer productivity and workflow metrics
  • Tracks working agreements and team performance
  • DORA metrics and cycle time analysis
  • No service inventory or architecture documentation
  • Cannot answer "what services do we have?" or "who owns this?"

Phaset

  • Comprehensive software catalog at its core
  • Software inventory with ownership and dependencies
  • Architecture documentation in one place
  • DORA metrics integrated with catalog context
  • Standards compliance and health scores
  • Single source of truth for "what we have" and "who owns it"

Why this matters: If you're primarily tracking developer productivity, Swarmia is excellent. But if you need to document architecture, track service ownership, or maintain a service inventory, you need a software catalog—which Swarmia doesn't provide. Phaset aims to give teams both the catalog and DORA metrics.

2

Self-Hosted with Data Privacy, Not Cloud-Only SaaS

Swarmia

  • Cloud-only SaaS platform
  • All engineering data stored in Swarmia's infrastructure
  • Access to GitHub/GitLab repositories and activity data
  • Data processing happens in their cloud
  • Subject to vendor's security and compliance measures
  • Cannot deploy in air-gapped or highly regulated environments

Phaset

  • Self-hosted on your infrastructure
  • All catalog and metrics data stays in your control
  • Integrations run within your network boundary
  • You control all data processing and storage
  • Meet compliance requirements for regulated industries
  • Works in air-gapped and on-premises environments

Why this matters: Organizations with strict data sovereignty requirements, compliance mandates (HIPAA, FedRAMP, government contracts), or security policies often cannot use cloud SaaS platforms that access repository data. Self-hosted Phaset provides complete data privacy and control.

3

One-Time Perpetual License, Not Per-Developer Subscription

Swarmia

  • €39 per developer per month (starting price)
  • Annual cost for 100 developers: ~€47,000 (~$51,000)
  • Costs scale linearly with every new hire
  • Budget impact grows as engineering team expands
  • User reviews cite "costly for larger teams"
  • Access ends when subscription stops

Phaset

  • $249 one-time payment for organizations
  • Annual cost: $0 after initial purchase
  • Unlimited users—no per-developer fees
  • Team growth doesn't affect software costs
  • Predictable budget with no recurring fees
  • Software keeps working forever, regardless of payment status

Why this matters: Over 3 years for 100 developers, Swarmia costs ~€141,000 (~$153,000) while Phaset costs $249 total. This pricing difference becomes more dramatic as teams scale. User reviews specifically cite Swarmia's per-developer pricing as a pain point for larger organizations.

4

Standards Compliance and Governance, Not Just Productivity Tracking

Swarmia

  • No built-in standards compliance features
  • Focus on workflow efficiency and productivity metrics
  • Tracks working agreements and team norms
  • No service-level compliance checking
  • Cannot enforce architectural standards or policies
  • Different problem domain—productivity vs. governance

Phaset

  • Built-in standards compliance and governance
  • Define and enforce engineering standards
  • Track compliance across software and teams
  • Health scores based on standards adherence
  • Structured reviews for human assessment
  • Multi-dimensional compliance visibility

Why this matters: If your goal is improving team productivity, Swarmia's workflow metrics are valuable. But if you need to enforce security standards, track technical debt, or ensure services meet architectural requirements, you need governance capabilities—which Phaset aims to provide alongside productivity metrics.

5

Flexible Customization, Not Limited Configuration Options

Swarmia

  • User reviews cite "limited customization options"
  • Constraints on investment categories and filtering
  • Predefined productivity metrics and dashboards
  • SaaS platform limits deep customization
  • Users report needing workarounds for specific use cases
  • Limited ability to adapt to unique organizational structures

Phaset

  • Flexible manifest-based catalog definition
  • Customizable metadata schema for your needs
  • Multi-dimensional organization (domains, systems, teams)
  • Define your own health score criteria
  • Self-hosted means full control over configuration
  • Adapts to your organizational structure, not vice versa

Why this matters: User reviews consistently mention Swarmia's customization limitations as a pain point. Organizations with unique structures, complex hierarchies, or specific compliance needs require flexibility. Phaset's manifest-based approach and self-hosted nature aim to provide that adaptability.

When Each Option Makes Sense

Choose Swarmia if you:

  • Need engineering productivity and workflow metrics
  • Want to optimize developer experience and cycle times
  • Prefer fully managed SaaS with no infrastructure
  • Have budget for per-developer subscription costs
  • Don't need a software catalog or service inventory
  • Focus on team productivity over architecture documentation

Choose Phaset if you:

  • Need a comprehensive software catalog and service inventory
  • Require self-hosted deployment for compliance or security
  • Want one-time costs instead of per-developer subscriptions
  • Need standards compliance and governance capabilities
  • Want DORA metrics integrated with catalog context
  • Focus on architecture knowledge and service ownership

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeaturePhasetSwarmia
Software Catalog✓—
Standards Compliance✓—
Health Scores✓—
DORA Metrics✓✓
Self-Hosted✓Cloud-only SaaS
Starting Price$249 once€39/user/month
Annual Cost (100 devs)$249 total~€47,000/year
Data PrivacyYour infrastructureTheir cloud
Setup Time<1 hourHours
Operational OverheadMinimalNone (SaaS)
Learning CurveLowLow
Architecture FocusKnowledge consolidationProductivity metrics
Multi-dimensional Organization✓ (3 dimensions)—
GitOps-Native✓—
Productivity Workflow Metrics—✓
Developer Experience FocusVia metricsâś“

Ready to Try Phaset?

Start with a free license for personal use, or get a perpetual license for your organization.